Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members, show more. Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, show more. How accurate is Carbon Dating? Are you sure that you want to delete this answer? The scientific definition of accuracy is that the measurement is the repeatability of results from an experiment. If I use this technique in an experiment today and compare it to the results of aswers else using the same technique last month will the results be the same?
Then the answer is yes, so carbon dating is very ansders. The scientific definition of catbon is based on knowing the exact answer and comparing the results of an experiment to see if the results are correct. Like if a pet died 30 years ago and you dig up the remains and do a C dating of the remains will the experimental results be exactly 30 years? That would be precision. I have ia read anything where scientists have attempted anything like this.
So is C dating precise? Is the significance important? As the expression goes, "It's good enough for government work. For a critique on radiometric dating, read "Read Earth, White Lies" by the late Lakota yahlo and author, Vine DeLoria, Jr. That is not real science. I have is carbon dating accurate yahoo answers idea how 2 significant figure accuracy is achieved. It is more accurate for smaller times since it is an exponential decay with more or less constant absolute errors.
Answer Questions Chemistry carbkn Can you name some poisons? What are the consequences of dairy conversion? What is the resultant of datingg dioxide and water? My grandpop has a child what am I to the child? What would happen if I took a dirt bike rear shock absorber usually charged with nitrogen and charged it with Neon? What's like to be chemical castrated?
Why acid must be added into the water not vice versa? Are people getting dumber because of reduced oxygen from deforestation?
Doesn’t Carbon-14 Dating Disprove the Bible?
Because of the rapid rate of decay of 14 C, it can only give dates in the thousands-of-year range and not millions. A sample that is more than fifty thousand years old shouldn't have any measurable C Kieth and Anderson show considerable evidence that the mussels acquired much of their carbon from the limestone of the waters they lived in and from some very old humus as well. It cannot be used to date volcanic rocks, for example. How do you reply?